The Common Reader & Four Literary Links

Nina Sankovitch

Nina Sankovitch

Last week I was still on the bench about Nina Sankovitch’s Tolstoy and the Purple Chair:  My Year of Magical Reading, her fascinating book about reading a book a day so she could sit still and grieve her sister’s death from cancer.  Blogging about the books was part of her daily routine.

After finishing the book, I loved it.  Sankovitch is a champion of the common reader.  It has always seemed to me that the common reader can explore literature with fire and avidity while the critic is tied to the convention of dry, bitter remarks even in a positive review.  Sankovitch is moved by books, and often finds connections to her own experience.  And isn’t this how we read?

She started her  project, wanting to read as she hadn’t read since she had knee surgery.

I resubmerged myself in a daily routine of hours spent reading.  But I had added a new practice to the routine.  I wrote about what I read, and I talked about books with anyone who wanted to talk with me.  In sharing ideas and thoughts about what I was reading, I found a fundamental new satisfaction in books:  talking about them.

One thing I love about this book is her enthusiasm.  In 1989, the critic Irving Howe complained in an article in The New Republic about the wide gap between literary critics and the common reader. Sankovitch wrote a letter which was published in the magazine.

I stated that as a common reader myself, I didn’t care much about what the literary critics were up to.  Neither they nor their critiques had anything to do with the books I loved to read.  When and if I did talk about books, it was not to discuss trends in narrative style or the latest critiques of text.  Instead, “it’s gossipy chatter akin to ‘what’s happening with the neighbors?’ We love our books and we love the very real people who populate them.”

Go, Nina!


1. Although I would no more join something called the 1938 Club (I’m more of a sixties person) than I would go to a croning event on my birthday, I very much enjoyed Karen’s six posts at her blog Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings on books published in 1938.  She was one of the facilitators of the event last week, and they were very lucky indeed to have such an enthusiastic, hard-working reviewer/leader.   Her post on George Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia has inspired me to get out my Orwell.   (And I’m sure Karen forgives me for not participating, since she knows I don’t do challenges.)

An illustration of Jane Eyre and Rochester by Fritze Eichenberg.

An illustration of Jane Eyre and Rochester by Fritze Eichenberg.

2. It’s Charlotte Bronte’s 200th birthday, and The Guardian has published an article in which Sarah Waters, Tessa Hadley, Jeanette Winterson, Margaret Drabble, Esther Freud, Andrew Motion, Maggie O’Farrell, Polly Samson, Helen Dunmore, Blake Morrison, Julie Myerson, Cornelia Parker, John Mullan, Helen Simpson, Polly Teale, Samantha Ellis, Mick Jackson, Joanna Briscoe, Linda Grant, Sarah Perry write about their reactions to Jane Eyre.

Tessa Hadley writes, “Jane Eyre is so built into the shape of my imagination that I can hardly think about it critically; I’m always in among its trees – the sturdy, northern, low-growing hawthorn and hazel bushes of its terrain – and can’t dispassionately estimate the size of the wood.”

3 I just found Zoe Brooks’ wonderful blog,  Magic Realism.  She writes, “Every week I bring you at least one review of a magic realism book.”

4.  If you’re a fan of historical novels, check out this article about the best historical novels of the year at The Telegraph.

6 thoughts on “The Common Reader & Four Literary Links

  1. Thanks for linking, Kat! And no, I quite understand why you wouldn’t want to take part – though it has been such fun! Do hope you enjoy the Orwell.


  2. Dear Kaggsy, I am now following your blog. What a cornucopia of fine talk about all sorts of good books. I like the 1930s books very much — from the more popular sort of thing you covered to Death of the Heart by Bowen. I might have a hard time in a group blog but I admit I’ve never tried it and it looks like fun.

    Thank you, mirable dictu for this blog and also the one on Magic Realism. I’ve noted the Guardian article.

    Yes why write about books unless you care and enter into them for real and that means personal soul. Not an academic exercise in order to publish in a journal and be promoted eventually.


    • Ellen, yes, there is good criticism and there is academic criticism. There are many stunning critics in my field, and yet every once in a while I come upon a piece about something totally absurd, in hope of publication. I like Nina Sankovitch’s approach: it’s harder than one would think to show why one likes a book.


    • Hi Ellen, thanks for your kind comments and I saw that you’d followed the blog! It’s been a most enjoyable week and the best thing is that people can dip in as much as they wish, or not at all – if you just want to read what we’re all saying about the books, that’s fine. We’re planning to do 1947 in October and that should be fun as well, so do join in, even if you just want to read the posts and comment! 🙂


  3. Pingback: What I’m Reading: Phyllis Rose’s The Shelf: Adventures in Extreme Reading – mirabile dictu

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s