Are you a book snob? I used to be. My knapsack burgeoned with books: Lewis and Short’s Latin dictionary, the Allen and Greenough Latin grammar, Cicero’s Pro Caelio, Camoens’ The Lusiads (a Portuguese epic), and, just in case I felt like committing suicide, Thomas Hardy’s histrionic Jude the Obscure.
But in my secret life–my leisure, I mean–I read mostly new literary fiction, books reviewed in The New York Times.
That’s how I met my husband. He, too, was a fiction junkie. One morning I was standing in line at Burger Palace waiting for coffee, reading a book by Ann Beattie. Standing behind me in line, my future husband told me he, too, was a Beattie fan; he had read her stories in The New Yorker.
Before long, we were book chat chums. And, lo and behold! he was a Latin student.
Our classics professors inhabited another realm of existence, the Upper Ether, where, as far as we could tell, they knew nothing of Burger King, literary fiction, or, God forbid, pop culture. No, these were guys who talked about dreaming in Latin. Then, one morning, in Age of Cicero class, the sophisticated professor started talking about Susan Howatch’s best-selling historical novel, The Rich Are Different. To say we were surprised is an understatement. He was brilliant, witty, and extremely demanding: he could be sarcastic if you were less than perfect, so we took care to be. Why was he talking about The Rich Are Different? It turned out Howatch’s saga, set in Manhattan in the 1920s, was based on the period of Roman history we were studying, with Julius Caesar cast as a Wall Street banker who quotes Catullus, Antony as his partner, and Cleopatra as a British cosmetics tycoon. (If you plan to read Howatch’s book, here is the list of Howatch’s characters and their Roman equivalents at Goodreads.)
Naturally, I bought the book and loved it.
Was it reviewed in The New York Times? Yes, in a round-up of three “novels of power.” The reviewer James R. Frake wrote,”The WASP hierarchy of the Eastern Seaboard move through the pages of this god‐awful ‘saga’ like balloon floats in a Macy’s Parade.” But he didn’t catch the connection with ancient Rome, which meant the NYT missed the point altogether. (People magazine got it!) Years later, Howatch’s six-book Starbridge series about the clergy was so highly respected that one of my English professors taught a class on it.
Nowadays reading pop fiction is more acceptable. Book review publications used to be aimed at intellectuals, or, to be more accurate, probably upper-middlebrow readers like myself. Nowadays, as they attempt to compete with Goodreads and social media, pop and literary overlap, and the lead review is as likely to be of the latest Stephen King as the new Joyce Carol Oates or Margaret Drabble.
Well, there is some good pop lit out there. Here is a list of pop novels inspired by the classics, which you may or may not have heard of. Enjoy.
1. Jo Walton’s The Just City (the first of a trilogy). In Walton’s brilliant, if very strange, philosophical novel, The Just City, the bookish Athene, goddess of war and wisdom, decides to found a city based on Plato’s Republic. Her brother, Apollo, bemused by the nymph Daphne’s dramatic rejection of his sexual advances (she prayed for help and was turned into a tree), decides to participate in the experiment, because he, too, has read Plato, and he wants to be reborn as a mortal to understand the human condition. Philosophers and other fans of Plato from different centuries are transported from different centuries to build the city. And Socrates turns out to be a great big trouble-maker who doesn’t approve of Plato’s republic a tall!
Walton, a Welsh-Canadian science fiction writer who has won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Tiptree Award, the Locus Award, and the Mythopoeic awards, read Plato as a classics major at the University of Lancaster.(You can read my post here.)
3. Feast of Sorrow by Crystal King. This clever, entertaining historical novel is my “to-go” book of the summer: I carry it everywhere and read it at coffeehouses or in line at the grocery store. Set in the first century A.D., it is narrated by the slave Thrassius, the cook (coquus) for the household of the wealthy Apicius, a Roman gourmet thought to have inspired a Roman cookbook called Apicius. In the novel, Thrassius writes the cookbook, and Apicius takes credit for it. It is great fun to read about the dinners (cenae), but there are also fascinating political intrigues and personal feuds. So far I am very much enjoying it. Good pop fiction!
4. Ovid by David Wishart. There are several historical mystery series set in ancient Rome: David Wishart’s Corvinus series is one fo the best Here’s the Goodreads description of Ovid: “Banished by the Emperor Augustus, the great poet Ovid was to die in exile. Years after Ovid’s death, Marcus Corvinus, grandson of the poet’s patron, tries to arrange for the return of his ashes to Rome for burial. When official permission is refused, Corvinus makes the dangerous mistake of asking why the Emperor has forbid it.”




9 & 10. There are many entertaining historical mystery series set in ancient Rome, but let me recommend Steven Saylor’s witty Roma sub Rosa series featuring Gordianus the Finder, a wisecracking private investigator. Lindsey Davis‘ Marcus Didius Falco series is equally clever, and she has recently embarked on the new Flavia Albia Series, in which Falco’s adopted daughter investigates crimes.
“It depends on what we mean by civilization,” the procurator mused.Staring at the corpse, I was in no mood to discuss philosophy. We were in Britain, where the rule of law was administered by the army. Justice operated in a rough-and-ready fashion so far away from Rome, but special circumstances meant this killing would be difficult to brush aside.
What an interesting list – none of which I’ve read!! The most ‘pop’ book I plan to pick up over the summer (once I’ve finished with War and Peace) is the Lord of the Rings (well, more than one book then). I read these to death about 30 years ago but I’d like to revisit. They’re probably not that ‘pop’ but they’re pretty famous nowadays but were still a bit culty when I read them.
LikeLike
All of these are well-written. Some are on the borderline between literary and pop–Walton, Graves, Massimo–but all would appeal to a pop audience, The Lord of the Rings is a fantasy classic by now, if not a classic-classic. But it appeals definitely to a pop audience. I read and loved it at 11!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Memoirs seems to be the favourite way to deal with classical history in novels. Marguerite Yourcenar’s Memoirs of Hadrian is the best-known, probably. There are also Alan Massie’s “autobiographies” of Augustus and Tiberius, George Shipway’s Imperial Governor, Peter Vansittart’s Three Six Seven: Memoirs of a Very Important Man (Mr Pooter in the Fall of Rome, you might say). Augustus by John Williams looks at the emperor in a different way and treats his life as an examination of “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”
LikeLike
I’ve long meant to read Massie’s books: I used to read his columns in The Spectator, which introduced me to some obscure 19th century novels by Meredith, etc. And you’re right about the memoir: I could just have easily have included I, Claudius, and David Malouf’s An Imaginary Life (about Ovid in exile). I’m adding your recommendations to my list for next fall when I buy books again. I like Williams’ Augustus more than Stoner. The same prof who recommended Howatch recommended Williams.
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
Some of Massie’s contemporary books are good too: The Death of Men and The Sins of the Fathers I remember particularly from the ones I’ve read.
LikeLike
More to add to the TBR list! I very much enjoyed his book columns.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:49 PM, mirabile dictu wrote:
>
LikeLike
I like some pop books and very much. My problem is I often can’t tell whether I will like a pop book — is it a good book, just a bit better than the average — or I won’t like and be so disappointed. This summer I’m reading Winston Graham’s non-poldark suspense books — these were once Book-of-the-Month club selections. They are however male or masculine books, meant for male readers from a male point of view.
DuMaurier wrote popular books; so did Wharton in the latter part of her career and these are uneven. Another women writer writing more popular books is Elizabeth Bowen, but then one of them will be a Booker Prize winner!
LikeLike
Yes, pop books are sometimes great, sometimes very disappointing. I do love the Poldark books, and I imagine I would enjoy his others, too. Mary Renaults are also pop books that appeal to everyone. There’s a fine line, and I think the canon is more flexible than it used to be.
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
I’ve just picked up on this post and until halfway through I was going to ask you if you knew Howatch’s Starbridge novels, but clearly you do. She was ‘the’ author to read in the UK during the seventies but I haven’t heard anyone mention her for sometime. I haven’t come across ‘The Rich are Different’ but am now off to look for a copy to see if I can still be as engrossed by her storytelling as I was all those decades ago.
LikeLike
Oh, I hope you enjoy it if you find a copy. I would love to read more Howatch, too. I have reread the Starbridge books twice.
LikeLike