The Great, the Good, & the Light: Conrad Richter’s The Trees, Sybille Bedford’s A Compass Error, & Margery Sharp’s The Nutmeg Tree

richter the trees

Love this kitschy cover!

My reading is nothing if not eclectic.  I have recently read (a) a neglected American classic about pioneer life by Conrad Richter; (b) a well-crafted novel by the English/European writer Sybille Bedford; (c) and a light romance by Margery Sharp.

The Trees Conrad Richter s-l300CONRAD RICHTER’S THE TREES (1940).   This is the first novel in Richter’s lyrical  trilogy, The Awakening Land.  He won the Pulitzer for the last book in the series, The Town, and the National Book Award for The Waters of Kronos (which I wrote about here). Alas, the trilogy is out of print in book form, but an e-book is available.

Richter’s beautifully-written novel is reminiscent of Willa Cather’s pioneer stories.  it unfolds in a simple, third-person narrative, sometimes omniscient, other times from a single character’s point of view.  It begins with the Luckett family’s difficult  journey from Pennsylvania to the woods of Ohio.

It was the game that had fetched the Lucketts out of Pennsylvania.  Months before the chestnut burrs had begun to sharpen, Worth Luckett looked for a woods famine.  It would be like nothing since the second winter after Yorktown, he claimed. He spent so much time in the woods with nobody to talk to but Sarge, his old hound, that when he opened his mouth Jary had learned to pick up her ears and listen.  For a month he had been noticing sign.  The oaks, beeches and hazel patches would have been slim mast for bears and pigeons this year.  Deer paths lay barer than any time he could recollect of fresh droppings.  And now the squirrels were leaving the country.

This family is smart, tough, and barefoot.  Nobody ever complains.  Worth Luckett is an adventurer, and his family has to put up with it.  Jary, his sociable wife, has cancer and hates living under “an ocean of leaves” in the thick forest with no neighbors.  Sayward, the oldest daughter, is smart and quiet, the one who takes responsibility when multiple tragedies occur.  ( I’m still  recovering from a couple of the traumas.)   Genny, the second daughter, is an attractive girl who  marries an abusive man.  The middle daughter, Achsa is treacherous, wanting what Genny wants.   Wyatt, the only son, longs to grow up and go hunting like his daddy; and Sulie, the toddler,  is hilariously optimistic. After visiting a general store, she declares, “We mought even git rich and have shoes!”

When they find a place to live, Worth takes off.  He is too busy exploring and hunting  to build a cabin, and they are camping out in a lean-to.  The leaves begin to fall, and at least Jary can see the sky then.  Then she presses Worth to build the house.  They can’t winter outside in the woods of Ohio.

The “ocean of leaves” can be claustrophobic.

Down in Pennsylvania you could tell by the light.  When a faint white drifted through the dark forest wall ahead, you knew you were getting to the top of a hill or an open place.  You might come out in a meadow or clearing, perhaps even in an open field with the corn making tassels and smelling sweet in the sun.  But away back here across the Ohio, it had no fields.  You tramped day long and when you looked ahead, the woods were dark as an hour or a day ago.

Gorgeous writing, and he uses dialect in the dialogue.  Is that the difference between Cather and Richter and why readers prefer her?  Richter explains in the acknowledgements that he tried to recreate the pioneers’ “mode of speech and thought” from  research, interviews and conversations, and his own memories of descendants and neighbors of pioneers in the mountains of Pennsylvania.

A great book!  At Goodreads several reviewers say this is their favorite book, and I can see why.  I especially love Sayward, the stable center of the house in the woods.

a compass error sybille bedford 9781582431598SYBILLE BEDFORD’S A COMPASS ERRORThis sequel to A Favourite of the Gods is a good read but very uneven.  Approximately sixty pages are devoted to the heroine Flavia’s retelling of the action in A Favourite of the Gods to her lover, Therese.  Why oh why didn’t I skip thosepages?  The book was not improved by Flavia’s synopsis.

But I love the character.  Young Flavia is  alone, studying for Oxford entrance exams in a town in France, while her mother, Constanza, a divorcee, travels with her lover, Michel, a writer.  They are waiting for his divorce from his first wife, who has not lived with him for years. Constanza is excited about marrying a man she loves.  (Her first marriage was unhappy.)

Meanwhile, Flavia reads and writes essays.  And because she wants solitude, she deceives both Constanza and their friend Mr. James, writing letter that imply that she is not alone.  She has a tight routine, until an artist’s wife, Therese, notices her eating alone in a restaurant and decides it is inappropriate.  Therese invites Flavia to eat dinner with her family every night.  They become lovers.

But that is innocence, though perhaps not quite what Flavia’s mother would want.  Then  a femme fatale comes to town and seduces Flavia, and we all want to say, “No! NO!”  I won’t tell you what happens, but it is devastating.  It’s not the lesbianism, mind you; it’s the purely evil character of this seducer.

Parts of this are very good, but it is just a good read, and disappointing after A Favourite of the Gods.

margery sharp the-nutmeg-treeMARGERY SHARP’S THE NUTEMEG TREE.  Is it possible to be too light?  Sharp’s light romances have been much praised by many bloggers, but my reaction is, Why?

Several of her light comedies have recently been reissued as e-books by Open Road Media.  They are definitely fluffy airplane reads:  if only I had had Martha in Paris (which I wrote about here) on my trip to London.

The Nutmeg Tree is charming and witty, but  D. E. Stevenson and  Angela Thirkell are deep and dark in comparison!  The beginning of The Nutmeg Tree is very, very funny. Julia is singing in the bathtub, while in the other room the bailiffs are rattling the doorknob and pleading with her to pay the five pounds she owes.  Eventually she sends them to fetch a pawnbroker she knows; he buys some of her stuff as a favor and she antes up to the bailiffs.  She has just enough money to travel to France to visit her daughter, Susan, whom she hasn’t seen in many years (Susan has been raised by her grandmother).  Susan has written to her about a young man she is engaged to, whom her grandmother doesn’t approve of.  And so Julia is off to give advice.

Julia reads The Forsyte Saga, so she’ll seem like an intellectual, not understanding that it is middlebrow fiction!  And as a former actress, she can’t help being impressed by a handsome trapeze artist she meets on the boat.  Fred’s mother is seasick, so Julia takes her place in the night’s performance.

And then she is off to see her daughter’s, and there is much romance and comedy.

It’s great fun, but…there’s not much here.

Just so you know what you’re getting…it’s more an entertainment than a novel.  And that certainly has its place.

13 thoughts on “The Great, the Good, & the Light: Conrad Richter’s The Trees, Sybille Bedford’s A Compass Error, & Margery Sharp’s The Nutmeg Tree

  1. You certainly do read a variety of books! As for Sharp, I’ve not read enough to make a judgement. I loved The Nutmeg Tree, and despite its fluffiness it was remarkably frank for the time it was written – and I also thought it had some good points to make about what the best kind of behaviour is and who really is moral and who isn’t. Conversely, I tried to read Thirkell and found myself so annoyed I had to give up! That’s the joy of reading I suppose – we’ll all have different opinions!

    Like

    • Oh, Thirkell and Sharp both have their fans! I love Thirkell, and her early books are excelelnt, but her later books can be irritating–and she is extremely classist, etc. (One of my aunts was appalled that I read Thirkell.) Yes, we all have different taste. There are so many books…we can only read the ones we enjoy.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I am trying to define what makes a good read and what makes a good reader and I have come to the point where I think there are objective reasons like plot, characters, style – all these criteria that are listed and explained in literary theory -, and there is the special affinity between the reader and the novel (assuming we are talking of fiction only), the way one relates with a book through one’s life’s experience, feelings, sensibitlity, culture, training, “acquis personnel” in French.
    And so, I have difficulties with pioneer literature; it is so remote for me. But I understand that I have to learn – the intellect is involved here – more of American history to understand and appreciate it. There is no immediate feelling for me in this case.
    With Bedford, the literary theory tells ma thaat the book is flawed. My feelings are mixed: I have come to the point where the British point of view sounds like “nombrilisme” that despises everything that is not British. I have to take some distance and things will be right again in some time.
    I agree with you with all my heart about Margery Sharp. Candy floss stuff. Comfort read at night when one seeks sleep.

    Like

    • I read Richter’s The Town before The Trees–the prize-wiining book, set in the town that rises in the forest–because I, too, don’t want to spend too much time in the woods. But The Trees turned out to be almost as good. I don’t think you have to know American history: it focuses on one family making a life in a new place.. Oh my God, I started crying just remembering one really terrifying scene. Think Cormac McCarthy mixed with Willa Cather!
      I do think Sharp is really bad, to tell the truth. I can understand why people like her, but she doesn’t go anywhere with her books and I honestly think they’re anti-feminist!

      Liked by 1 person

      • I like a good comfort read when I feel bad, but I think that Alison Light is
        right when she says that these “neglected, forgitten British women writers” are conservative (Forever England). However, they are much in demand these days. I wondred why and I think it is because they were rediscovered by Light, Beauman, Humble, then more minor academics who found a new field of research. They were acclaimed for “bad” reasons by readers who followed them and by publishers who found a new market and refurbished material. But it is anathema to say so…

        Like

        • I haven’t read Light, but it IS true: some of these books are ridiculously conservative. Virago and Persephone have published some very important books and some of the Forever England variety. Virago tends to be more radical, but I have read some excellent Persephones, too, and some that actually offend me. Life is hard when you can’t get a maid! Virago published a few Margery Sharps and that’s why I thought they might be good1

          Liked by 1 person

  3. I haven’t read The Nutmeg Tree but have found her other books entertaining — with flashes of real social insight. So be it.

    Stay with Richter. I read the trilogy some years ago and it left me with respect for what the pioneers accomplished. They were tough survivors and they did survive, but the series ends with (for me) a feeling of sadness about what they destroyed in the process.

    Like

    • I read The Town first and am now backtracking! Conrad Richter is so good, dated now, I suppose, because nobody’s going to bother reading dialect. But I do think he’s someone who should be revived, maybe in Libarry of America! Yes, all the losses are dreadful. I am haunted by what happens in The Trees.

      Like

  4. I read the Richter trilogy in middle school after watching a tv movie of it. I still remember them and The Light in the Forest. Great books! I should reread them. I am finding books I have read early in my life are so different now that I’m, er, older.

    Like

    • So many of us read Richter! Yes, I enjoyed The Light in the Forest, and we did read it in school. The Waters of Kronos is one of my favorite books ever). But we do read books differently now we’re adults.:)

      Like

  5. I read the Richter trilogy back in the 80s (i think) (and saw the TV miniseries too) and would like to reread one day. I loved Sayward, she was such a strong figure. Also I am thinking about reading the LIttle House series this summer along with an online course that’s being advertised. I dont remember reading the Little House books when I was young, I wonder if I did and just dont remember them that well. So much to read for the first time! Your posting about the Kristin Lavrandsdatter books moved them up to the front of the TBR list. I too wish the Library of America would issue the Richter Trilogy and the Waters of Krono and his other works. Should we start a write-in email campaign? It might help.

    Like

    • Yes, Richter would be perfect for Library of America! I’ll email if you’ll email! I liked the later Little House books when I was a girl but somehow the early ones seemed too simple. They are considered classics now so I should give them a try.

      Like

  6. Pingback: A Giveaway of Sybille Bedford’s A Legacy – mirabile dictu

Leave a Reply to camilledefleurville Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s